Convex Review 2026: Reactive Backend Pricing, Pros and Cons
What Convex's free, Starter, Professional and Business plans cost, how function calls drive the bill, and when Supabase or Firebase is the cheaper backend.
Convex is worth it in 2026 for a TypeScript team that wants a reactive database, server functions and auth in one place, and its free plan is generous enough to ship a real prototype. The free plan costs $0 with hard caps of 1M function calls and 0.5 GB of database a month; Starter keeps the same allowance and bills overage, at $2.20 per extra million calls; Professional is $25 per developer a month with 25M calls included; Business carries a monthly minimum. Those are monthly prices read on Convex's pricing page on October 19, 2026, and Convex offers annual commit discounts only on Business.
The catch is the meter. Convex counts client calls, scheduled runs, file accesses and every subscription update as a function call, so a busy live view costs more than its request count suggests. Toolradar data: the low-code backend ranking on Toolradar tracks 114 tools as of October 19, 2026, with a median cheapest paid plan of $30 a month across the 28 that publish a price, so one Professional seat sits just under the category's typical entry fee.
Key factsBest for: TypeScript teams building realtime apps that want the…
- A reactive TypeScript backend where queries update live and functions, crons, search and storage share one bill.
- Free plan: $0 with 1M function calls a month
- Paid entry: Professional, billed per developer
- Business: $2,500 monthly minimum
- Alternatives covered: Supabase, Firebase, Neon, Nhost
Pros
- The free plan bundles function calls, a database, file storage, search and crons without a credit card.
- Professional includes 25M function calls and 50 GB of database storage per team.
- Query and mutation compute is free on serverless deployments, so reads cost calls and I/O, not CPU time.
Cons
- Professional is priced per developer, so four developers pay $100 a month before usage.
- Subscription updates count as function calls, so popular live views add calls with every change.

Convex replaces the usual stack of database, API layer, websocket server and cron runner with one TypeScript backend. You write queries and mutations as functions, the client subscribes to them, and Convex pushes new results whenever the underlying data changes. That reactivity is the product, and it is also what you pay for.
This review is for developers and engineering leads choosing between Convex, Supabase, Firebase and Postgres-first options such as Neon. It covers how the platform works, what each plan costs per unit of usage, where the per-developer fee changes the comparison, and who should pick something else. Devshot runs no test lab, so every figure here comes from Convex's own pricing page and documentation, not from a trial deployment.
What is Convex?
Convex is a hosted backend platform built around a reactive document database. Its pricing page lists file storage, text search, vector search, crons, webhooks, auth with more than 80 OAuth integrations and Node.js actions on every plan, including the free one, plus preview deployments and a selectable data region. The pitch is that a TypeScript developer never writes a REST layer or a cache-invalidation rule: the database knows which queries depend on which documents and re-runs them for subscribed clients.
Convex also lists an open-source edition you can self-host and develop against locally, plus an AI Gateway that calls major models through one API. The hosted service is the default path, and that is what this review prices.
How Convex works
Your backend lives in a convex folder as TypeScript functions. Queries read data and are cached and reactive, mutations write data inside a transaction, and actions call third-party APIs and can run on the Node.js runtime. A React, Next.js, React Native, Vue, Svelte, Python, Swift, Kotlin or Rust client calls those functions and, for queries, stays subscribed to them.
The limits shape the architecture. Per Convex's limits documentation, a query or mutation may run for 1 second of user code and read up to 16 MiB or 32,000 scanned documents, while Convex-runtime actions run for up to 30 minutes and Node actions up to 10. Heavy reporting queries therefore belong in actions or a separate analytics store, not in a live subscription.
Billing follows the same model. Every explicit client call, scheduled execution, subscription update and file access counts as a function call, and query and mutation compute is free on serverless deployments, so function calls, database storage, database I/O and egress are the lines that move the invoice.
Convex key features
Convex pricing
Convex bills a per-developer fee plus metered resources, and the free plan is the only one with hard caps. Free and Starter share the same allowance: 1M function calls, 20 GB-hours of action compute, 0.5 GB of database storage, and 1 GB each of database I/O, file storage and egress a month. On Free, mutations that would write past the caps may fail; Starter keeps running and bills overage at $2.20 per extra million calls, $0.22 per extra GB of database storage or I/O and $0.132 per extra GB of egress. Professional raises the allowance to 25 times as many calls, 250 GB-hours of action compute, 50 GB each of database storage, I/O and egress, and 100 GB of file storage, at slightly lower overage rates.
Our arithmetic gives a clear upgrade point for a solo developer. At 12M function calls a month, Starter's call overage is $24.20, about the price of one Professional seat, and that seat includes more than twice that volume. Below that volume Starter is cheaper on calls alone; above it, Professional is cheaper and adds backups, log streaming and email support. Storage and egress overage shift the line, so price your own usage against both columns.
The per-developer fee is the line that grows with the team, not with the app. Four developers on Professional pay $100 a month before any overage, while Supabase's pricing page lists Pro with the first project included, further projects from $10 a month and no per-developer fee. Convex's limits apply per team, so adding a developer adds cost but not allowance. Deployments outside US regions are priced at 1.3x, per the limits documentation.
Business is a commitment, not a plan you drift into. Its monthly minimum works out to $30,000 a year and buys SAML SSO, service SLAs, custom roles, dedicated deployment classes and annual commit discounts. Pricing on this page is monthly: Convex shows no annual price for Free, Starter or Professional.
Methodology: we read Convex's pricing page and its limits documentation on October 19, 2026, with competitor prices from Supabase pricing, Firebase pricing, Neon pricing and Nhost pricing the same day. Scenario totals and break-even points are our arithmetic on those list prices, not quotes or benchmarks.
| Plan | Price | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 1-6 developers, 40 deployments, 1M function calls and 0.5 GB database a month as hard caps |
| Starter | $0 plus usage | Same allowance as Free, then pay as you go, for example $2.20 per extra million function calls |
| Professional | $25 per developer/month | 1-20 developers, 300 deployments, 25M calls, 50 GB database, backups, log streaming, email support |
| Business & Enterprise | $2,500 monthly minimum | SAML SSO, service SLAs, custom roles, dedicated deployments, volume pricing and annual commit discounts |
Convex pros and cons
What we like
- The free plan bundles function calls, a database, file storage, search and crons without a credit card.
- Professional includes 25M function calls and 50 GB of database storage per team.
- Query and mutation compute is free on serverless deployments, so reads cost calls and I/O, not CPU time.
What could be better
- Professional is priced per developer, so four developers pay $100 a month before usage.
- Subscription updates count as function calls, so popular live views add calls with every change.
Who Convex is for
Convex fits a TypeScript team building a collaborative or live-updating product: dashboards, chat, multiplayer editors, AI agents that stream state to a UI. The reactive model removes the cache and websocket work that a Postgres stack needs, and the free plan's caps are high enough to launch a side project without a card.
A solo developer should start on Starter rather than Free once real users arrive, because Free's hard caps can make writes fail, and should move to Professional when call volume or the need for backups justifies a seat. Teams that price per seat elsewhere should model the per-developer fee early, since it is the line that grows fastest with headcount.
Convex is a weaker fit when your data is relational and you want SQL: Supabase and Neon give you Postgres you can dump and move. Mobile-first apps that lean on Google's analytics, messaging and crash reporting fit Firebase better, and the mobile backend ranking covers that case. For the wider field, see the best backend-as-a-service ranking and the Firebase alternatives list.
Best Convex alternatives
If Convex is not the right fit, these are the closest options.
| Tool | Best for | Starts at | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Convex | TypeScript teams building realtime apps that want the database, functions and sync in one service. | Free with capped usage | Visit → |
| Supabase | Teams that want real Postgres with auth, storage and realtime around it. | Free plan | Visit → |
| Firebase | Mobile apps on Google Cloud that want analytics, messaging and crash reporting in one console. | Spark plan at no cost with daily quotas | Visit → |
| Neon | Teams that want serverless Postgres and plan to build the rest of the backend themselves. | Free plan | Visit → |
| Nhost | Developers who want Postgres with a Hasura GraphQL API and auth in a hosted bundle. | Starter free | Visit → |
The bottom line
Convex is worth paying for when live data is the core of the product and the team writes TypeScript. Start on Free for a prototype, switch to Starter before real users arrive so writes never hit a hard cap, and move to Professional at roughly 12M function calls a month or when you need backups and log streaming. Budget the per-developer fee from day one, and watch subscription updates, the meter most teams underestimate.
Pick Supabase or Nhost if you want Postgres and a flat organization fee, Neon if you only need the database, and Firebase if the app is mobile-first on Google Cloud. Our Supabase pricing and Neon pricing explainers price those plans in detail, Supabase vs Firebase settles the most common head to head, and cloud free tiers compared lines up the no-cost options. Directory records: Convex, Supabase, Firebase and Nhost on Toolradar.
Cite this: Devshot, 'Convex Review 2026: Reactive Backend Pricing, Pros and Cons', November 2026.
Frequently asked questions
How much does Convex cost in 2026?
Is Convex free?
What counts as a function call in Convex?
Is Convex cheaper than Supabase?
Does Convex offer annual billing?
Sources
Prices and plan details come from each vendor's own pricing page, re-checked by the Toolradar pricing tracker.
- Supabase pricingchecked Sep 2026
- Firebase pricingchecked Sep 2026
- Neon pricingchecked Sep 2026
Some offers on this page may be paid placements or contain affiliate links.
Get the Devshot brief
Free daily newsletter, read in 5 minutes.
Subscribe free