Best Firebase Alternatives in 2026
Eight exits from Firestore, with the Iowa read bill, the plan that can stop spend, and the rewrite each one still leaves you.
Supabase is the best Firebase alternative in 2026 when document reads are the bill and you want a ceiling. Pro is $25/mo per organization, and spend caps are on by default. Use Appwrite when a budget cap should deny the API, Convex when the client must stay reactive, and PocketBase when you will run the binary.
Stay on Firebase when offline sync and the Google client SDKs are the product you would have to rebuild. Spark shuts the over-quota product off for the rest of the month, while Blaze keeps billing that same traffic with no hard stop.
Key facts8 tools compared: Supabase, Appwrite, Convex, Nhost, Backendless, Xano, AWS Amplify, PocketBase
- 8 tools compared: Supabase, Appwrite, Convex, Nhost, Backendless, Xano, AWS Amplify, PocketBase
- Appwrite (best for: Teams that want a budget cap to deny the API, or Docker on their own machine): Pro matches the Supabase organization entry; allowances are listed per project
- Convex (best for: TypeScript apps that need live queries and can accept a per-developer bill): Professional is per developer, up to 20; Business has a monthly minimum
- Nhost (best for: Teams that want Hasura GraphQL on Postgres and one invoice for the org): Pro is the same organization entry as Supabase, plus $15 in compute credits; Starter pauses after 1 week
A Firebase alternative is a hosted database, auth, and functions stack you adopt to leave Firebase. Firestore reads, or the lack of a hard stop on Blaze, are the reason you are leaving. An organization plan, a per-developer seat, and a peak-requests day fail in different months, so pricing them as one invoice picks the wrong ceiling.
Toolradar data: as of October 16, 2026, Toolradar tracks 111 low-code backend tools. Supabase is the most compared tool in that set over the last 90 days, with 625 side-by-side comparisons, on the low-code backend ranking. That catalog is wider than this exit list, and it is the public set that actually contains these products.
Prices below were checked on October 16, 2026, on each vendor's pricing page. Read the Firebase review for the product you are leaving, and Supabase vs Firebase when the choice is only those two. Use the backend-as-a-service ranking when there is no live Firestore app to move.
Top Picks
Based on features, real-world fit, and value for money.
Postgres with auth, storage, and edge functions, and a spend cap that starts on for teams exiting Firestore.
From $25/mo (Pro, per organization); free projects pause after 1 week
Teams leaving Firestore who want Postgres and a spend cap already on
Auth, database, storage, and functions, with a Pro budget cap and a Docker install you operate.
Pro matches the Supabase organization entry; allowances are listed per project
Teams that want a budget cap to deny the API, or Docker on their own machine
A reactive document store with TypeScript functions, billed per developer, so headcount sets the bill before traffic.
Professional is per developer, up to 20; Business has a monthly minimum
TypeScript apps that need live queries and can accept a per-developer bill
| Tool | Pricing | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Supabase | From $25/mo (Pro, per organization); free projects pause after 1 week | Teams leaving Firestore who want Postgres and a spend cap already on |
| Appwrite | Pro matches the Supabase organization entry; allowances are listed per project | Teams that want a budget cap to deny the API, or Docker on their own machine |
| Convex | Professional is per developer, up to 20; Business has a monthly minimum | TypeScript apps that need live queries and can accept a per-developer bill |
| Nhost | Pro is the same organization entry as Supabase, plus $15 in compute credits; Starter pauses after 1 week | Teams that want Hasura GraphQL on Postgres and one invoice for the org |
| Backendless | Scale from $15/mo per app; developer seats are unlimited | Visual backends where seats should be free and the bill follows API peaks |
| Xano | Essential $85/mo billed annually, or $99/mo monthly; Free is rate limited | Teams who will draw the API on Postgres instead of rewriting security rules |
| AWS Amplify | No monthly minimum; standard builds $0.01/min after 1,000 minutes | Apps that already live in an AWS account and should not add a second vendor |
| PocketBase | No hosted price; open-source binary, docs currently ship v0.40.5 | A single binary on a VPS when the cloud meter is what you want gone |
Pricing read from each vendor's own pricing page, checked Oct 2026. 3 of 8 have no standalone price (bundled, usage-based or free to self-host) and are described as charged, not guessed.
Supabase
Postgres with auth, storage, and edge functions, and a spend cap that starts on for teams exiting Firestore.
- Pricing
- From $25/mo (Pro, per organization); free projects pause after 1 week
Best for: Teams leaving Firestore who want Postgres and a spend cap already on
Pros
- Pro lists unlimited API requests, so the per-document read line is not the meter you are buying
- On Pro the spend cap starts on, and you turn it off only when you will pay past the plan limits
- The Docker setup and the CLI have no license fee if the organization bill is the objection
Cons
- Only two free projects may stay active, and an idle one pauses after a week, so shared staging needs a paid plan
- SOC 2 and ISO 27001 sit on Team, a separate plan from Pro, so compliance is not in the organization rate
Appwrite
Auth, database, storage, and functions, with a Pro budget cap and a Docker install you operate.
- Pricing
- Pro matches the Supabase organization entry; allowances are listed per project
Best for: Teams that want a budget cap to deny the API, or Docker on their own machine
Pros
- Pro lists 2 TB of bandwidth, 150 GB of storage, 3.5 million executions, and 200,000 monthly active users per project
- A Pro budget cap stops automatic scaling, and hitting it denies API access until you raise the cap
- Self-hosting runs on Docker, including a one-click image, and you keep the data location
Cons
- Free projects pause after a week, and the free plan throttles database operations instead of billing overage
- Reads still count rows, with 1,750,000 included a month on Pro, then the overage in the table
Convex
A reactive document store with TypeScript functions, billed per developer, so headcount sets the bill before traffic.
- Pricing
- Professional is per developer, up to 20; Business has a monthly minimum
Best for: TypeScript apps that need live queries and can accept a per-developer bill
Pros
- Professional includes 25 million function calls, then $2 per extra million, and US East is the 1.0x region
- Free includes 1 million calls, then $2.20 per extra million, and 0.5 GB of database
- Daily backups, custom domains, and the HIPAA and SOC 2 reports are on Professional
Cons
- The seat is the developer, so a flat traffic month still costs more as the team grows
- Business starts at a $2,500 monthly minimum, and the store is not Postgres
Nhost
Postgres, Hasura, auth, storage, and functions, billed per organization, and overage does not stop the app.
- Pricing
- Pro is the same organization entry as Supabase, plus $15 in compute credits; Starter pauses after 1 week
Best for: Teams that want Hasura GraphQL on Postgres and one invoice for the org
Pros
- Pro includes 10 GB of database and 50 GB of storage, on one organization invoice
- Dedicated compute is $50 per vCPU per month, with 2 GB of RAM per vCPU
- The pricing FAQ says you can export the database and storage
Cons
- Starter keeps a single project active, and that project pauses after a week idle
- Passing a limit does not stop the project, so the excess is charged
Backendless
A codeless cloud backend priced per app, with unlimited developer seats and a daily peak meter.
- Pricing
- Scale from $15/mo per app; developer seats are unlimited
Best for: Visual backends where seats should be free and the bill follows API peaks
Pros
- Scale lifts realtime connections from 5 on Free to 1,000 and tables from 20 to 100, past the free ceiling
- Scale Variable tier 1 is $0.50 per day when the peak is 0 to 5 requests per minute
- Another 10 GB of file storage, past the 10 GB on Scale, is a $20/mo pack
Cons
- Cloud Code stays at 5 seconds on Scale, and the 20-second pack is $30/mo
- A spike bills that day's tier, so a quiet monthly floor is not the invoice
Xano
A visual Postgres backend with a hard free rate limit, and CSV or YAML export when you leave.
- Pricing
- Essential $85/mo billed annually, or $99/mo monthly; Free is rate limited
Best for: Teams who will draw the API on Postgres instead of rewriting security rules
Pros
- Essential removes the free cap of 10 requests per 20 seconds and adds direct database access
- Paid storage is 100 GB of files, and the database is not capped at the free plan's 100,000 records
- Essential includes SOC 2, ISO, and GDPR, along with 5 seats and 3 workspaces
Cons
- The lower Essential price is the annual rate, and month-to-month is the higher published figure
- Self-hosting is a Custom plan, so the documented exit on Essential is export, not a free install
AWS Amplify
Frontend hosting with Cognito, Lambda, and a database you attach yourself, and no seat fee on this bill.
- Pricing
- No monthly minimum; standard builds $0.01/min after 1,000 minutes
Best for: Apps that already live in an AWS account and should not add a second vendor
Pros
- Team access is free, so headcount does not add a seat line on this page
- AWS's five-developer example is the hosting total in the table, not a database quote
- New AWS accounts can receive up to $200 in Free Tier credits
Cons
- That example leaves out auth, the database, and functions, so it is not the whole invoice
- The firewall row in the table is a monthly line per app, before that firewall's own usage
PocketBase
An open-source SQLite backend in one file, with auth, files, and realtime, and no hosted plan.
- Pricing
- No hosted price; open-source binary, docs currently ship v0.40.5
Best for: A single binary on a VPS when the cloud meter is what you want gone
Pros
- v0.40.5 bundles SQLite, auth, file storage, and the admin UI in one executable
- Realtime subscriptions and the REST API run in that same process
- There is no seat line and no vendor usage meter to forecast
Cons
- The docs say it is not recommended for production-critical apps before v1.0.0
- SQLite is embedded, so a second app server does not share the file the way Postgres does
What it is
You are replacing a client that talks to the database directly, so the phone is still doing the job of a server. Security Rules decide which documents a signed-in user can touch, and that model is what you have to rebuild. Cloud Functions, the place for logic that must not ship on the device, stay off until the project is on Blaze, so a webhook already forces the paid plan.
Google bills a read when a listened document is added, updated, or removed from the result, so a chatty screen costs more than the documents you stored. A mobile client that reconnects after 30 minutes offline is billed as a new query, and an offset charges a read for every skipped document. The Firebase review walks through those rules, while this page prices what leaving them costs.
Spark and Blaze are the only plans on the pricing page, and they fail in opposite directions once you cross a quota. On Spark, crossing a no-cost quota shuts that product off for the rest of the calendar month, which is a hard stop your users will feel. On Blaze the same traffic is billed, and a budget alert does not cap the charge, so the email does not stop the invoice.
Spend caps that pause new usage are documented for Firebase AI Logic, App Hosting, Cloud Functions, and Extensions. Firestore reads are not on that list, so the meter behind this exit is the one a cap cannot pause.
The rewrite is the security model, not a connection string, so you restate the rules before the data moves. Firestore rules that call get() or exists() become row policies on Supabase, collection permissions on Appwrite, or a TypeScript function on Convex. A listener the mobile SDK kept warm becomes a Postgres change feed, a Hasura subscription, or a Convex query. None of those copies Crashlytics, Cloud Messaging, or the offline cache in the Google client SDK, which is why a phone app sometimes stays on Firebase.
Phone sign-in is a separate trap, because the pricing page marks phone auth as unavailable on Spark and bills it per SMS on Blaze. Email and a social provider can move with the database. A texted code carries a carrier price you have to re-quote, and that price is not in the plan sticker.
How we compared: on October 16, 2026 we read the pricing pages of these eight products, Firebase's plan page, and the Firestore Standard rates for Iowa (us-central1). The 111-tool ranking is the wider catalog, and this is a price comparison rather than a timed migration, because this site does not run a test lab.
Why it matters
The number that pushes a team off Firestore is a day of reads, not a seat. Ten million document reads a day in Iowa leaves 9,950,000 billable reads after the 50,000 free reads. At $0.03 per 100,000, that is $89.55 over 30 days, before writes, storage, or egress. The free quota resets around midnight Pacific time and does not roll forward, so a slow day does not fund the spike.
Headcount is a different invoice, and it is the trap if you price every plan like an organization fee. Five developers on Convex Professional are $125/mo before usage, because the seat is the developer, so hiring raises the bill even when traffic does not. A five-person Supabase organization pays the org rate once, and the included compute credit covers one Micro instance. A second Micro project is the case Supabase prices at $35/mo on its own example, the cost of another environment rather than another developer.
AWS Amplify's published five-developer example is $8.08, and that total is build minutes plus hosting, not a Firestore replacement. Cognito, DynamoDB, and Lambda are separate lines, so the example stays small only when those services were already on the bill. If the rows are the next question, the Postgres hosting guide and the Neon review drop the backend wrapper, and the plan-by-plan math is on Supabase pricing.
Leaving the read meter does not mean the next database is unmetered, and Appwrite still counts a read per row returned. One call that lists 50 rows is 50 reads, and an empty result still counts as one. A wide table spends a monthly quota rather than a daily one.
Nhost will not stop the project when you pass a limit, so the excess shows up on the invoice. Supabase stops until you turn the cap off, so the failure is a paused project rather than a larger bill. Choose Nhost when a pause is worse than overage, and Supabase when the surprise invoice is what you are leaving to avoid.
Backendless and Xano put the API on a canvas, which suits a team that will not port security rules into SQL. The cost moves to seats and to the peak minute, not to each document a phone listens to. Thirty quiet days on Backendless's lowest daily tier land on the monthly Scale floor, and one busy day jumps to a higher tier for that day only. That spike is what a Firestore listener used to hide inside the read line.
Self-hosting is a different product even when the logo matches, and it wins only when the cloud meter is what you want gone. Supabase's Docker setup and CLI have no license fee, and Appwrite installs with Docker on a machine you patch. Convex runs on your servers under a license that bars a competing hosted product.
PocketBase is one file the docs do not recommend for production-critical apps before v1.0.0. The Appwrite review and the self-hosting guide cover that install, and later changes show up in the Devshot brief.
Key features to look for
Pricing
Check whether the plan can stop spend before you trust the sticker. Firebase publishes Spark at no cost and Blaze as pay as you go, with $300 in credit if the billing account is eligible. A budget alert on Blaze does not cap Firestore, so that credit is not a ceiling.
Supabase Pro bills the organization up front and turns spend caps on until you disable them. Prices checked on October 16, 2026 on Firebase pricing, the plan documentation, and Firestore Standard pricing for Iowa.
The organization rate is not the whole Supabase invoice. Disk past 8 GB is $0.125/GB, monthly active users past 100,000 are $0.00325 each, and point-in-time recovery is $100 per 7 days. Team, where the compliance reports sit, is $599/mo, so those reports are not on the organization plan. Edge functions include 2 million invocations on Pro, and the full ladder is on Supabase pricing.
Appwrite Pro includes 1,750,000 reads and 750,000 writes a month, then $0.060 per 100,000 reads and $0.10 per 100,000 writes, from the reads and writes doc. The plan card on Appwrite pricing is the organization price. The smallest dedicated database tier on that page is a separate compute line, so the sticker is not the database. Free operations are throttled at 500,000 reads and 250,000 writes, with no overage, so a free project slows down instead of billing you.
Convex, Nhost, Xano, Backendless, and Amplify do not share that read unit. Convex Professional's call allowance and the $2 overage are on Convex pricing, with US East at 1.0x. Nhost's database overage and the vCPU rate are on Nhost pricing, and passing the limit does not stop the project.
Xano's annual and monthly Essential rates are on Xano pricing. Backendless bills the daily peak on Backendless Cloud pricing. Amplify's build rate and the five-developer example are on Amplify pricing, and that example is hosting rather than the database. PocketBase publishes no hosted price on its docs, so you pay for the machine you run.
| Plan | Price | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Firebase Spark | No-cost | No card. No Cloud Functions. Over quota shuts that product off for the month |
| Firebase Blaze | Pay as you go | Spark quotas included, then usage. Budget alerts do not cap Firestore |
| Firestore reads, Iowa | $0.03 per 100,000 | After 50,000 free reads a day. Quota resets around midnight Pacific |
| Firestore writes, Iowa | $0.09 per 100,000 | After 20,000 free writes a day on the Standard edition |
| Firestore reads, 10 million a day | $89.55 | 30 days in Iowa, past the free reads, reads only |
| Cloud Functions invocations | $0.40 per million | After 2 million a month on Blaze. Not available on Spark |
| Firebase SQL Connect | From $9.37/mo | Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL after a 3-month trial, first instance |
| Supabase Pro | $25/mo | Per organization, 100,000 MAU, 8 GB disk, spend cap on by default |
| Supabase Micro compute | $10/mo | 1 GB RAM. The Pro credit covers one instance |
| Supabase two Micro projects | $35/mo | Supabase's own example: plan, two compute lines, one credit |
| Supabase extra disk | $0.125/GB | After 8 GB per project on Pro |
| Supabase extra MAU | $0.00325 each | After 100,000 monthly active users on Pro |
| Supabase Team | $599/mo | SOC 2 and ISO 27001, 14-day backups |
| Supabase PITR | $100 per 7 days | Point-in-time recovery, per project, Pro and above |
| Appwrite Pro reads | $0.060 per 100,000 | After 1,750,000 reads a month. Writes are a separate overage |
| Appwrite Pro writes | $0.10 per 100,000 | After 750,000 writes a month on Pro |
| Appwrite dedicated Starter | $10/mo | 1 core and 1 GB for a dedicated database, plus monthly compute credits |
| Convex Professional calls | $2 per extra million | After 25 million function calls. US East is 1.0x |
| Convex free calls | $2.20 per extra million | After 1 million function calls on Free |
| Convex database, Free | $0.22/GB | After 0.5 GB on the free allowance |
| Convex Business | $2,500/mo minimum | 50 or more developers, SAML, service SLAs |
| Five Convex Professional seats | $125/mo | Five developers before usage. Traffic does not set this line |
| Nhost database overage | $0.20/GB | After 10 GB on Pro |
| Nhost dedicated vCPU | $50 per vCPU/mo | 2 GB of RAM per vCPU, billed by the minute |
| Nhost function time | $0.18 per GB-hour | After 10 GB-hours on Pro |
| Backendless Scale | $15+/mo | Per app, unlimited developer seats, then a daily API tier |
| Backendless Scale Variable tier 1 | $0.50/day | Peak of 0 to 5 API requests per minute that day |
| Backendless Cloud Code, 20 seconds | $30/mo | Scale itself stops a script at 5 seconds |
| Backendless extra file storage | $20/mo | Another 10 GB past the 10 GB included on Scale |
| Xano Essential, annual | $85/mo | Billed annually. 5 seats, 3 workspaces, no platform rate limit |
| Xano Essential, monthly | $99/mo | Month-to-month Essential, same inclusions as the annual card |
| Xano Pro, annual | $224/mo | 10 seats, 99.99% SLA, HIPAA available as an add-on |
| Amplify standard build | $0.01 per minute | After 1,000 build minutes a month |
| Amplify data transfer | $0.15/GB | After 15 GB a month |
| Amplify published example | $8.08/mo | Five developers, build minutes plus hosting, not the database |
| Amplify Web Application Firewall | $15/mo per app | Before the firewall's own usage charges |
| PocketBase hosted | No hosted price | Open-source binary. You pay for the machine you run |
The bottom line
Move a Firestore app to Supabase when you want Postgres, unlimited API requests on the plan, and a spend cap that starts on. Keep Firebase when offline sync, Crashlytics, and Cloud Messaging are the product you would have to rebuild, because none of the exits copy that client.
Appwrite fits a cap that denies the API, or Docker on your own machine, and a wide list still counts as rows. Convex bills the developer for live TypeScript queries, so a quiet month still grows with the team. Nhost fits Hasura and will not stop the project past a limit, so you budget overage instead of a pause.
Backendless fits a visual API with unlimited seats and a daily peak. Xano fits a drawn API on Postgres at the annual Essential rate, with export as the way out. Amplify fits an account that already pays AWS, and PocketBase fits a VPS you already patch.
The wider catalog is the 111-tool ranking, and the hosting choice beside the backend is the serverless platforms guide. Cite this: Devshot, "Best Firebase Alternatives in 2026", October 2026.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best Firebase alternative in 2026?
How much does it cost to leave Firebase?
Is there a free Firebase alternative?
Supabase vs Firebase: which should you move to?
Does Firebase have a spend cap?
Can I self-host a Firebase alternative?
Is AWS Amplify cheaper than Firebase?
Sources
Prices and plan details come from each vendor's own pricing page, re-checked by the Toolradar pricing tracker.
- Supabase pricingchecked Sep 2026
- Appwrite pricingchecked Sep 2026
Some offers on this page may be paid placements or contain affiliate links.
Get the Devshot brief
Free daily newsletter, read in 5 minutes.
Subscribe free