Review

Postman Review 2026: Pricing, Pros, Cons and Alternatives

What Free, Solo, and Team include, where monitor blocks and AI credits run out, and when a second seat or SSO changes the bill.

Product links may be affiliate links. How we rate 4 alternatives covered
TL;DR

Postman is worth Solo in 2026 when you work alone and you want scheduled monitors, mocks, and data-driven runs, at $9/mo billed annually. Free and Solo are both one user, so a second editor moves the account to Team at $19 per user a month, also billed annually. Enterprise does not publish a list price, and SSO is an add-on outside Team that has to cover every licensed user.

A one-request monitor every five minutes fits the paid allowance, and the same schedule on a three-request collection needs a monitor block on top of the seat. Insomnia still includes Git Sync for three people without a seat fee, which matters when a second login is the only reason to leave Solo. Seat totals for three, ten, and twenty-five people are on the Postman alternatives page, and this page prices Postman's own meters.

Key factsBest for: One developer who wants hosted monitors and mocks and will…
  • Updated: October 20, 2026
  • Best for: One developer who wants hosted monitors and mocks and will not add a second editor.
  • Price as of October 20, 2026: Team is $19/user/mo billed annually and Solo is the cheaper one-user annual plan, while Enterprise is contact sales.
  • A hosted API workspace where Free and Solo stay a single user, so the second editor moves the account to Team.
  • Who can edit: Free and Solo each include one user, so a second person who needs to edit has to move the account to Team.
  • SSO on Team: Simple Security is a per-user add-on, and Postman requires it for every licensed user, so the identity bill matches the seat count.
  • Monitor allowance: Free includes 1,000 monitoring requests a month, and Solo, Team, and Enterprise each include 10,000 per team, so a tight schedule outgrows Free first.
  • Free AI credits: The Free plan card lists 100 AI credits a month, and the comparison table on the same pricing page lists 50, so forecast from the table.

Pros

  • Native Git, the MCP client, and unlimited collection runs are on Free, so the runner is not why you start paying.
  • Solo adds data-file runs, custom domains, and the larger monitor pool, and it is still one user.
  • Team adds unlimited viewers, basic RBAC, and SDK generation, and it is the first plan that lets a second person edit.

Cons

  • Free and Solo both stop at one user, so a teammate is a Team purchase even when usage is small.
  • The Free card and the comparison table disagree on the monthly AI allotment, and paid overage stays on unless you turn it off.
Postman product screenshot
Who can editFree and Solo each include one user, so a second person who needs to edit has to move the account to Team.
SSO on TeamSimple Security is a per-user add-on, and Postman requires it for every licensed user, so the identity bill matches the seat count.
Monitor allowanceFree includes 1,000 monitoring requests a month, and Solo, Team, and Enterprise each include 10,000 per team, so a tight schedule outgrows Free first.
Free AI creditsThe Free plan card lists 100 AI credits a month, and the comparison table on the same pricing page lists 50, so forecast from the table.

Buy Solo if you are one developer and the collection runner, mocks, and monitors are the job. Do not buy Team until a second person has to edit, because Free cannot hold that person either. That one-user wall is the 2026 change from the old free team of three. Enterprise is a sales conversation, so a security review that starts there has no public sticker to defend.

Methodology: plan prices, user caps, credit allotments, and monitor rates were read on 17 October 2026 on Postman's pricing page, the plans doc, the monitor usage doc, and the AI credits doc. Competitor stickers were read the same day on Bruno's pricing page, Insomnia's pricing page, Hoppscotch's pricing page, and Apidog's pricing page. No workspace was signed into, and this site does not run a test lab. A total that multiplies a published rate by seats, or a schedule by days, is arithmetic from those pages.

Toolradar data: as of October 2026, Postman is tied for 7th most-listed alternative among 481 API tools, and it is 6th among 387 testing and QA tools. It is listed as an alternative to 43 other tools. Visitors most often compare it with Insomnia, Bruno, and Apidog. The profile is on Toolradar, and the wider set is the API tools ranking.

Use this page for the Postman invoice: the one-user wall, the SSO add-on, AI credits, and monitor blocks. Use API testing tools when you are still choosing the client, and stay here once the question is what this account charges.

What is Postman?

Postman is a hosted workspace for sending requests, saving collections, mocking responses, running tests, and publishing docs. The client covers HTTP, GraphQL, gRPC, WebSocket, and MQTT, and the same account can call an MCP server, so those protocols do not need a second client. Native Git is on every plan, including Free, so versioning a collection is not what you pay for.

The March 2026 plans replaced the old lineup, and Free, Solo, Team, and Enterprise are the plans on sale. Basic and Professional are closed to new customers, so an existing Basic team moves to Team over time while a Professional customer can still renew. A blog post that still quotes Basic is a plan you cannot start, so do not budget the year from it.

Mock server use is unlimited on every current plan, so traffic is not the mock bill. Collection-based mocks are on Free, and a code-based mock takes Solo or above, while collection runs are unlimited, which removes the old runner add-on. Custom domains are unlimited on Solo, Team, and Enterprise and absent on Free. Docs stay Postman-branded until Solo, so a branded public doc is a reason to leave Free even when you work alone.

How Postman works

You keep requests in collections, variables in environments, and checks in the collection runner or the CLI. Free can run that loop for one account, and it cannot create a team or invite a collaborator, so a second editor is not a setting. The plans doc says the old free plan could invite up to three people. Team is the first plan with unlimited users and unlimited viewers, which is the change a second editor forces.

A monitor call is one request in one region, so extra requests and a second region each count again, and scheduled runs share that pool with private API monitoring. Free pauses monitors when the cap is hit, which is a silent stop, and paid plans leave pay-as-you-go on by default. Unused blocks expire with the period, so a block bought early does not carry into a quiet month.

AI credits renew on the billing date and do not roll over, so a quiet week does not bank capacity for a heavy one. On a paid plan, pay-as-you-go stays on unless a billing admin turns it off, and the extra credits land on the next invoice. Free shows no overage rate, so it stops when the credits run out and does not bill you.

Team and Enterprise turn Auto-Flex on by default, so a new seat is billed on the next cycle, and a self-serve team should not assume a sales grace period. Simple Security, the Team SSO add-on, has to cover every licensed user, so you cannot buy SAML for one admin. SCIM, audit logs, and partner workspaces are Enterprise, and partner editors on those plans do not take a paid seat.

If the calls sit behind a gateway, see API gateways, and if the client is calling an MCP server, see MCP servers. Those pages price the layer around the request, which is a different bill from the Postman seat.

Postman key features

One user until TeamEssential
Free and Solo each include one user and cannot form a team, so a second editor changes the plan. Team is the first plan with unlimited users and unlimited viewers.
Monitor calls, counted per requestEssential
One endpoint in one region is one monitoring call, so extra requests and extra regions multiply the count against the monthly allowance. A long collection on a tight schedule is what exhausts the month.
AI credits that do not roll overEssential
Credits reset each billing period and do not roll over, so a light week does not save capacity for a heavy one. Paid overage stays on unless a billing admin disables it.
SSO sold for every Team seatEssential
Simple Security is the Team add-on for SAML and the listed identity providers, and every licensed user is on it. Enterprise includes SSO, and SCIM stays on Enterprise, outside that add-on.
Unlimited mocks and collection runs
Current plans do not meter mock traffic or collection runs, so volume is not the mock bill. Code-based mocks, data-file runs, and webhooks start on Solo, and cloud load is a separate virtual-user-hour rate.
Recovery, API calls, and integrations
Deleted collections can be restored for 1 day on Free, 30 days on Solo, and 90 days on Team and Enterprise. Free is a bad place to notice a deletion the next week. Calls to the Postman API on Free match the paid monitor allowance, and Team includes 1 million, while integrations cap at 5, 10, 50, and 100.

Postman pricing

The bill that surprises a two-person team is the seat, then SSO, then a monitor scheduled too tightly, in that order. Prices below were checked in October 2026 on Postman's pricing page. Free cannot do this job, because it is one user, it has no SSO add-on, and it sits on the smaller monitor pool. Solo raises that pool and turns on data-file runs, and it is still one user, so two editors means Team.

Two seats at the annual Team rate come to $38 a month, or $456 for the year, which is the invoice before identity. Monthly Team billing is $23 per user, so the same two people cost more if you refuse the annual term, and that premium buys a shorter contract. Simple Security has to cover every licensed user, and two people on that add-on bring the month to $50, or $600 for the year. Drop the add-on and you are back to the seat total, with no SAML, so the security requirement is the gap between those two yearly figures.

A year of Solo for one person is $108 on the annual rate, and a year on the monthly Solo sticker is $144. That gap is real, and it still does not buy a teammate, so the monthly term is a short contract and the second editor is still a Team purchase.

Monitors are the usage line a five-minute schedule can exhaust. One request, one region, every five minutes is 12 calls an hour, 288 a day, and 8,640 in a 30-day month, and that single check fits the paid per-team allowance. The same schedule on a three-request collection is 25,920 calls, so those extra calls need another block.

Postman sells that capacity at $20 per 50,000 requests a month, and one block covers this schedule, with no per-call rate published beside the block. The free cap pauses that five-minute check before the month ends, because 8,640 calls is already past it.

AI credits are the other meter, and the Free plan disagrees with itself, so forecast from the table until the dashboard says otherwise. The plan card says 100 AI credits a month, and those credits reset without rolling over. The comparison table says 50 a month for Free, 400 for Solo, 400 per user on Team, and 800 per user on Enterprise, pooled.

Overage on the table is $0.05 per credit on Solo, $0.04 per credit on Team, and $0.035 per credit on Enterprise, with volume pricing available on Enterprise. 600 credits past the Solo allotment, with pay-as-you-go on, is $30 on top of the plan.

Cloud performance tests are $0.04 per virtual-user hour on Solo, Team, and Enterprise, so a cloud load test is a separate line from the seat. Local performance tests are unlimited on every plan, including Free, so a test from your own machine is not that line.

Context Graph queries include a monthly allowance, higher on the paid plans, then $0.01 per query. Flows credits are a separate pool: 25 a month on Free, 50 on Solo, 100 per team on Team, and 500 per team on Enterprise. Postman does not publish a per-credit price for Flows overage, so that overage cannot be forecast. If Agent Mode is writing the tests, the AI test generation guide is the neighboring spend.

Bruno is the cheaper seat when the collection can live in Git, which is the move if Postman's one-user wall is the objection. Open Source allows two workspaces and public Git providers only, with five OpenAPI syncs a month, so a private repository is a paid seat from the first person. Private Git starts on the paid annual tiers and removes the workspace cap. Ultimate's trial is 14 days with no card, and Bruno on Toolradar sits beside Postman's record.

Insomnia Essentials includes Git Sync for up to three users plus the Inso CLI, so three people can share a repo sync before a seat fee. Pro costs less annually than monthly, and Enterprise keeps one figure for both terms, self-serve through 50 users, which is where SSO and SCIM sit. Mocks past the included allowance are then sold in a block of 25,000. Hoppscotch's free plan is a personal workspace, and its paid plans are annual, so two people sharing a workspace are already paying.

Apidog's plans guide caps the free plan at four users, and a failed charge falls back to that cap until the invoice is paid, pausing edits while the data stays. Professional and Enterprise publish annual per-user rates, and docs readers are not seats, so a public doc does not multiply that bill. See API documentation tools and GraphQL tools when you are pricing the spec, and Insomnia on Toolradar for the profile next to Postman.

PlanPriceBest for
Postman FreeFreeOne user, 1,000 monitor requests a month, and collection recovery for 1 day
Postman Solo, annual$9/mo, billed annuallyOne user, data-file runs, custom domains, and 10,000 monitor requests
Postman Solo, monthly$12/moThe same Solo features, paid month to month instead of annually
Postman Team, annual$19/user/mo, billed annuallyUnlimited users and viewers, basic RBAC, and SDK generation
Postman Team, monthly$23/user/moThe same Team features on a month-to-month term
Postman EnterpriseContact salesAPI catalog, audit logs, SCIM, and SSO included rather than an add-on
Postman Simple Security$6/user/moSSO for every licensed Team user. Not sold on Free or Solo. No SCIM
Postman AI overage, Solo$0.05/creditPay-as-you-go after the included credits, on unless a billing admin turns it off
Postman AI overage, Team$0.04/creditThe Team rate for credits past the monthly allotment
Postman AI overage, Enterprise$0.035/creditEnterprise overage, with volume pricing available through sales
Postman monitor block$20 per 50,000 requestsExtra monitoring calls per team per month. Unused blocks expire
Postman cloud performance$0.04/VuHVirtual-user hours on Solo, Team, and Enterprise. Local tests are unlimited
Postman Context Graph query$0.01/queryCharged after the monthly query allowance, which is higher on paid plans
Bruno Open SourceFreeTwo workspaces, public Git providers only, five OpenAPI syncs a month
Bruno Pro$6/user/mo, billed annuallyPrivate Git, unlimited workspaces, two license admins, 48-hour support
Bruno Ultimate$11/user/mo, billed annuallyUnlimited license admins, 24-hour support, and invoicing. 14-day trial, no card
Insomnia EssentialsFreeGit Sync for up to three users, the Inso CLI, and a monthly mock allowance
Insomnia Pro, monthly$12/user/moUnlimited users, RBAC, and Git Sync for every user on the monthly term
Insomnia Pro, annual$10/user/mo, billed annuallyThe same Pro features, billed annually per user
Insomnia Enterprise$45/user/moSSO, SCIM, unlimited mocks, self-serve through 50 users. Same on annual
Insomnia mock overage$10 per 25,000 requestsCharged after the included mocks on Essentials or the higher Pro allowance
Hoppscotch FreeFreePersonal workspace, collections, scripts, and a collection runner
Hoppscotch Business$6/user/mo, billed annuallyTeam workspaces, shared collections, docs, mocking, and an MCP server
Hoppscotch Enterprise$11/user/mo, billed annuallySAML and OpenID Connect, SCIM, audit logs, and domain controls
Apidog FreeFreeUp to four users. A failed paid invoice falls back to this cap
Apidog Basic$9/user/mo, billed annuallyThe first paid step after the four-user free cap
Apidog Professional$18/user/mo, billed annuallyThe published annual plan between Basic and Enterprise
Apidog Enterprise$27/user/mo, billed annuallyThe top published plan once a team has outgrown Professional

Postman pros and cons

What we like

  • Native Git, the MCP client, and unlimited collection runs are on Free, so the runner is not why you start paying.
  • Solo adds data-file runs, custom domains, and the larger monitor pool, and it is still one user.
  • Team adds unlimited viewers, basic RBAC, and SDK generation, and it is the first plan that lets a second person edit.

What could be better

  • Free and Solo both stop at one user, so a teammate is a Team purchase even when usage is small.
  • The Free card and the comparison table disagree on the monthly AI allotment, and paid overage stays on unless you turn it off.

Who Postman is for

Postman fits one developer who wants the hosted monitors and mocks and will stay on Solo. The annual term is the cheaper way to buy that year, and the monthly term is there when the contract has to stay short. Free is a working client, with native Git and unlimited collection runs, but a tight production monitor will pause when the free pool runs out.

It is the wrong default when a second person needs edit access, or when SAML is a requirement on day one, because Team plus Simple Security bills seats and identity together. Buying Enterprise to avoid a blank public price is a weak move until you know the control you need: SCIM, audit logs, partner workspaces, or the private runners. If the collection should live in the repo, price Bruno before Team, because a private remote is Bruno's paid step.

Pick Insomnia when three people need Git Sync and nobody is ready for a seat, the free path Postman no longer offers. Pick Hoppscotch when the client should stay in the browser and the annual Business seat is enough. Pick Apidog when four people can share a free team and the next step is still a published per-user rate. The client roundup is API testing tools, and the seat grid for three, ten, and twenty-five people is Postman alternatives.

Devshot's daily brief is where a Postman plan rename or a credit-table change shows up as one note, before it hits a renewal. Subscribe free if you want that monitor-and-seat note in the inbox.

Best Postman alternatives

If Postman is not the right fit, these are the closest options.

ToolBest forStarts at
PostmanOne developer who wants hosted monitors and mocks and will not add a second editor.Team is $19/user/mo billed annually and Solo is the cheaper one-user aVisit →
BrunoTeams that keep collections in Git and will pay an annual seat for a private remote.Open Source is free, and Ultimate is $11/user/mo billed annually, withVisit →
InsomniaThree people who want Git Sync before anyone pays for a seat.Essentials is free for three Git Sync users, and Pro is $10/user/mo biVisit →
HoppscotchBrowser-first developers who will pay an annual seat for a shared workspace.Free for a personal workspace, and Enterprise is $11/user/mo billed anVisit →
ApidogA team of four that wants one published seat price for design and tests.Free for up to four users, with Professional at $18/user/mo and EnterpVisit →
Lowest published monthly price by toolBar chart of the lowest monthly price each vendor publishes; the same figures are in the comparison table above.Lowest published monthly pricePostman$19Bruno$11Insomnia$10Hoppscotch$11Apidog$18
Lowest monthly figure each vendor publishes, checked Oct 2026. A tilde marks a figure the vendor states approximately. Per-seat and usage charges can sit on top of it. Every tool here publishes a monthly price.
Bruno
An open-source client with native Git, where a private remote is the paid step even for the first person.
Visit →
Insomnia
A REST, GraphQL, and gRPC client whose free Git Sync covers three users, with SSO only on Enterprise.
Visit →
Hoppscotch
A web client whose free plan is a personal workspace, with team sharing on the annual Business plan.
Visit →
Apidog
An API design and test platform whose free plan covers four users and whose paid plans list annual rates.
Visit →

The bottom line

Postman is worth Solo for one person who will use the monitors and the data-driven runner. It is a weak buy on Team when the only new fact is a second login, and weaker if that team also needs SAML, because the add-on covers every seat. A year of the two-seat SSO scenario is $600, and a year of those two seats without SSO is $456, so identity is a large share of that bill. Enterprise still has no public list price, so compare the control you need with Insomnia Enterprise's published rate before you open a sales thread.

Choose Insomnia when three people can live inside free Git Sync, and choose Bruno when the collection belongs in Git. Use Postman alternatives for the seat grid once the team is larger than this page prices.

The one-user wall and the monitor block are the change the Devshot brief is built to catch before a renewal. Subscribe free if you want the next Postman plan edit in the inbox ahead of that date.

Cite this: Devshot, "Postman Review 2026: Pricing, Pros, Cons and Alternatives", October 2026.

Frequently asked questions

Is Postman worth it in 2026?

Yes, on the annual Solo plan, when one person wants data-driven collection runs, custom domains, and the larger monitor pool, and that plan does not add a second user. The annual Team plan is worth it when several people edit the same workspace and you want viewers and basic RBAC. It is a poor trade when the only goal is SAML, because Simple Security is extra and applies to every licensed user, so the identity bill grows with headcount. Enterprise does not publish a list price, so a security review that starts there has nothing public to compare.

How much does Postman cost?

Free is one user, so it cannot be the shared workspace. Solo is $9/mo billed annually, or $12/mo month to month, and that choice is the length of the contract. Team is $19 per user a month billed annually, or $23 per user month to month, and Enterprise is contact sales. Simple Security, the Team SSO add-on, is charged per licensed user and must cover the whole team. Two annual Team seats are $38 a month, or $456 for the year, before that add-on. These figures were read on Postman's pricing page on 17 October 2026.

Does Postman have a free plan?

Yes, Free includes the multi-protocol client, native Git, unlimited collection runs, and collection-based mocks, for one user, so it is a real client until a second person shows up. It includes 1,000 monitoring requests a month, and monitors pause when that cap is hit, so the check stops instead of billing you. Collection recovery is one day, so a deletion noticed the next week is already gone. The plan card lists 100 AI credits a month, and the comparison table lists 50, so budget the table. There is no team invite, and the plans doc says the previous free plan could invite up to three users, an invite that is gone on the March 2026 plans.

How does Postman compare with Insomnia and Bruno?

Postman Free and Solo are one user, so a teammate is a plan change. Insomnia Essentials includes Git Sync for up to three users at no seat price, which is a free team Postman does not offer, and Pro's annual rate is lower than its monthly rate. Bruno Open Source is free for public Git and two workspaces, and private Git starts on the paid annual tiers, so a private repo is the paid step from the first person. Postman is the client that meters scheduled monitors and AI credits, and larger seat grids are on the Postman alternatives page.

What happens if you exceed Postman monitors or AI credits?

On Free, monitors pause for the rest of the billing period once you pass the included requests, so the check stops instead of billing you. On paid plans, pay-as-you-go can keep them running, and blocks are $20 per 50,000 requests a month, with unused blocks expiring at the end of the period. A three-request collection every five minutes, in one region, is 25,920 calls in a 30-day month, past the 10,000 included on paid plans, so that schedule needs a block. AI credits do not roll over, and Solo overage is $0.05 per credit if pay-as-you-go stays on. The Free card and the comparison table disagree on the allotment, so forecast from the table.

Sources

Prices and plan details come from each vendor's own pricing page, re-checked by the Toolradar pricing tracker.

Related guides

Some offers on this page may be paid placements or contain affiliate links.

Get the Devshot brief

Free daily newsletter, read in 5 minutes.

Subscribe free